One of the reasons for this could be the nature of phenotypic complexity which is the result of reticulated interactions among many different physiological and cellular processes and environmental conditions . We used genetic and phenotypic analyses in the tomato IL’s, coupled with meta-analyses of existing data, to identify several co-regulatory relationships between carbon metabolism and leaves . This study proposed that leaf shape may affect the sugar content of tomato fruit through developmental and photosynthetic mechanisms. We used these relationships in directed experiments to explore additional avenues for fruit quality improvement.Previous studies have shown that there is a direct regulation of yield and BRIX in tomato through leaf shape by modeling these relationships using PLS-Path Modeling . This correlation was performed in heirloom cultivars which retain a large amount of genetic diversity compared to commercial varieties. This can make identifying the causative gene/s difficult. Another study utilizing monogenic mutants and their isogenic backgrounds showed a correlation between decreased vascular density and BRIX in tomato fruit. Here we used 17 tomato introgression lines , backcrossed IL , and sub IL’s to identify a specific gene which may influence Brix and yield through regulation of leaf shape and vascular density, bHLH032. bHLH032 is a SPATULA like transcription factor which when knocked out via CRISPR resulted in plants with decreased vascular density and increased BRIX x Yield .Leaf shape for these lines was measured and compared to their BRIX and yield traits from the same plants. Approximately 7637 leaflets were measured over two growing seasons, and their shape characterized using PCA analysis .
Nine lines showed significantly rounder leaflets compared to M82, including BIL 260, sub ILsub IL 4-3-4, BIL 063, blueberry in container and sub ILsub IL 5-4-1 . Additionally, two lines, sub ILsub IL 8-1-3 and IL 9-1-2, were significantly narrower than M82, with leaflets of the remaining lines similar in shape to M82 . BIL 260 and sub IL 4-3-4 had improved yield, and BIL 260 had improved BRIX at terminal harvest . Of the remaining lines, BIL 338 and BIL 378 were trending higher in yield than M82 at terminal harvest but were not significantly different . The inverse relationship between BRIX and yield has long been established , however BIL 260 breaks this relationship with an increase in both traits with yield greater than M82 by approximately 3-fold and increased BRIX . sub IL 4-3-4 also had an increased yield at just over 2 times that of M82 but had no significant difference in BRIX from M82 . To further quantify the total output of BIL 260 and sub ILs 4-3-4, they were grown with M82 over three independent field seasons, and the BRIX and yield of their terminal harvest multiplied to obtain the BY value index, a composite value which accounts for variations and extreme values in either measurement . The BY of BIL 260 is significantly higher than that of M82 at approximately 20, while M82 has a BY of 14 . The BY of sub ILs 4-3-4 was elevated but not significantly different from M82, most likely due to only an increase in yield and not BRIX .Because leaves are the primary site of photosynthesis, and responsible for most of the sugar production in plants, we checked to see if the photosynthetic rate , and stomatal conductance were altered in these lines. Several lines showed decreased photosynthesis compared to M82 , but only BIL 260 had increased photosynthesis . This increase is small but significant despite the large range of photosynthesis found in M82 . Several lines had reduced gst compared to M82, corresponding to lines which had decreased photosynthesis .
These same lines had reduced, but not significantly different, yields and BRIX values compared to M82 with the exception of BIL 338 and BIL 378 which each had slightly higher yield values . Both BIL 260 and sub IL 4-3-4 had similar gst as M82, despite the increase in photosynthesis in BIL 260 . Finally intrinsic water use efficiency was calculated for M82, BIL 260, and sub IL 4-3-4, with both introgression lines having significantly higher values suggesting both lines utilize water more efficiently than M82 . How this may impact the other measured physiological traits was not specifically studied in this research.To further understand the sugar usage in BIL 260 and sub IL 4-3-4 we analyzed sugar and starch mobilization and transport in leaves. This measurement was done at two-hour intervals across 24 hours for each of the three lines that were the focus of a detailed analysis, to identify time points where differences in their sugar and starch usage may occur . Figure 2d shows the sugar content of the leaves for all three lines measured as μmols per gram fresh weight. Much of the increase in sugar took place between 7am and 7pm hours, as would be expected as these were daylight hours , and for all three lines the concentration and change in sugar content was similar . However, between 1 am and 5 am there was an initial decrease in sugar content in M82 but then a subsequent large increase. In contrast, leaf sugar concentration in BIL 260 and sub IL 4-3-4 continued to decrease over this time period, suggesting that the sugar was either being utilized in the leaf or exported out of the leaves . Figure 2e shows the starch content from the same leaves and at the same time points. During daylight hours the change in starch content in the leaf is similar, though much higher in M82 at solar noon and interestingly all three genotypes have a decrease in starch content during the 1am to 5am time period .
This decrease in starch content and the concomitant increase in sugar content over this time in M82 suggests starch mobilization to sugar for usage in the leaves as no photosynthesis is taking place at this time . However, BIL 260 and sub IL 4-3-4 had a continued decline in sugar content of their leaves despite similar starch mobilization to that found in M82, which suggests that either the sugar is being utilized in the leaves at a more rapid rate or is being exported from the leaves at an increased rate . Despite the decrease in sugar content in BIL 260 and sub IL 4-3-4 being similar, BIL 260 has less sugar at 5am than either M82 or sub IL 4-3-4, likely due to even higher export rates .BIL 260 and sub IL 4-3-4 are both introgression lines which contain a small portion of Chromosome 4 from the S. pennelli genome in a majority M82 background. Because they both have yield difference but only BIL 260 has increased fruit BRIX and lower vascular density, we performed Whole Genome Sequencing to determine the exact location of the introgressions. In both lines the introgression is limited to chromosome 4, and there are no other introgressions present in the genome . The introgression spans the centromeric region and contains approximately 800 genes in each. However, there are a small number of genes introgressed from S. pennellii that are uniquely present in BIL 260 but not sub IL 4-3-4 on both the 5’ and 3’ ends of the introgression . On the 5’ end of the introgression there are 75 additional genes introgressed in BIL 260, while three additional genes are present on the 3’ end. Among the 78 additional genes from S. pennellii three are transcription factors, specifically bHLH032 , R2R3MYB20 , and a GRAS transcription factor . We hypothesized that these genes could be responsible for the differences seen between BIL 260 and sub IL 4-3-4 in factors such as yield, BRIX, vascular density, plastic planters bulk and sugar transport. As such we performed an RNA-Seq analysis for these lines and M82 covering three time points , and three tissue types in a field setting . The RNA-Seq data was split by tissue type and analyzed across all three time points. UMAP dimensionality reduction and Mean Shift clustering were performed on the DEGs for each tissue type . To determine the tissue type of most interest we looked for the three unique transcription factors from BIL 260 in the DEG lists and then for their position in the clustering. For SAM tissue the bHLH032 transcription factor was a DEG and present in clustering but the other transcription factors were not . In mature leaves bHLH032 was again a DEG present in the clustering but the other two were not . Young leaves, defined as those leaves fully developed but not expanded, had all three of these transcription factors of interest present in the DEG list .
The GRAS transcription factor was within Cluster 6 which had GO enrichment for protein folding and intracellular protein transport. The R2R3Myb was found within Cluster 31 which had no significant GO enrichment . bHLH032 was found within Cluster 19 which had GO enrichment terms relating to sugar metabolism and extracelluar regions . Additionally, the ortholog of bHLH032 in Arabidopsis is Abnormal Shoot 5 , which when over expressed causes upward curled leaves and increased vascular density . It is also shown thatABS5 interacts with Lonesome Highway to initiate vascular development in combination with TMO5 . Given the leaf and vascular changes observed in BIL 260 along with the increased BRIX and yield, we chose to pursue cluster 19 and the bHLH032 TF. Gene co-expression analysis was done on cluster 19 to identify any differences between BIL 260 and M82 . The M82 network for cluster 19 contains bHLH032 as a peripheral gene connecting to the network through Solyc08g067030 . A BLAST search of the protein sequence for this gene showed three potential Arabidopsis orthologs, At4g32460 , At5g11420, and At5g25460 . All three genes have expression in either mature or developing leaves, and BDX is involved in vascular development . Additionally, a phospolipase-A2 like gene was also correlated with the BDX/DGR2 gene . An aldose-1-epimerase , is also present and could indicate a connection with sugar metabolism or processing. The BIL 260 network did not contain the bHLH032 gene but did still have BDX/DGR2 connected to the central network . The aldose-1-epimerase was no longer within the central part of the network, but a peripheral gene, and not connected BDX/DGR2 . The same was found for the phospholiapse-A2 like gene, indicating a large rearrangement of the network including the loss of bHLH032 . The absence of bHLH032 from the BIL 260 network suggested either a loss of function or reduction in expression for the S. pennelli version of this gene, and so we analyzed the expression values found in the RNA-Seq data . The overall expression of bHLH032 in BIL 260 was lower than that in M82, with a p-value of 0.06 across all weeks. At week 10, when plants were flowering and beginning early fruiting, the expression of bHLH032 in young leaves was much lower than that found in M82 . This was confirmed by the eFP browser for tomato which also showed that in S. pennellii bHLH032 has a much lower expression than M82 .There are approximately 800 genes found within the BIL 260 introgression from S. pennellii, and as such the differences in BY, leaf shape, and vasculature could be a result of other genes within the introgression and not the bHLH032 despite the gene co-expression network results. To determine if this was the case we back-crossed BIL 260 with M82 to break up the introgression region. The F1 populations were grown in the greenhouse for seed, and then 400 F2 plants were taken to the field for characterization. The BY for all lines, including the parent lines M82 and BIL 260, were measured . There was a wide range of BY’s with the majority of plants falling within the parent plants range, but transgressive phenotypes were seen as both lower and higher than either M82 or BIL 260 . The vegetative biomass was also measured and compared to fruit mass to see if there was an equivalent change in both, but vegetative biomass remained consistent across all F2 plants while yield was highly variable . From these data we selected lines that had both high and low BY as well as round and narrow leaflets to grow the F3 and F4 populations . Additionally, all 400 lines were sequenced using GT-Seq .