Gollin et al. explain that the Green Revolution “emerged from philanthropic efforts … to address the challenges of rural poverty and agrarian unrest in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s, and it involved a concerted effort to apply scientific understandings of genetics to the development of improved crop varieties that were suited to the growing conditions of the developing world.” Based on longitudinal international research and impact models from 1960-2000 , Evenson and Gollin suggested that the Green Revolution considerably raised the health status of preschool children and lowered the infant and child mortality rates in developing nations. In his retrospective review of the Green Revolution, Pingali demonstrates that Green Revolution “contributed to widespread poverty reduction, averted hunger for millions of people, and avoided the conversion of thousands of hectares of land into agricultural cultivation.” However, these successes were accompanied by unintended negative consequences . In the post-Green Revolution, Pingali shows, food insecurity persists, nutrition is lagging, and environmental impacts were mixed. Pingali characterizes these costs as unintended negative consequences, not because the technology was bad, but because of the policies that encouraged rapid implementation these technologies. Policies led to interregional food security disparities in South Asia and South America , a lackof support for women in agricultural technology transfer , the abandonment of micro-nutrient rich traditional crops for incentivized staple crops , and the over-use of inputs such as fertilizers, pesticides, and irrigation water . Food insecurity, square flower bucket as defined by the New Oxford American Dictionary , is the state of being without reliable access to sufficient quantity of affordable, nutritious food.
Food insecurity is an ongoing matter with an increase in world undernutrition since 2015 to 821 million people, and a long-continued global increase in micronutrient deficiency among the non-hungry that leads to obesity . Regarding addressing food insecurity in the long-term, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization argues that “global resources are sufficient,” estimating enough food can be produced for the forecasted peak population of 9.1 billion people. Instead, the FAO argues that food security is limited by economic and institutional frameworks in the distribution of the available food stores. The FAO argues that food security is also limited by local resource constraints and the overuse of resources until a tipping point is reached and the society becomes impoverished. Obesity and other effects from improper nourishment are most prevalent in North America . In 2006, the USDA reported that 7.4 million acres of additional cropland would need to be harvested for Americans to eat the nationally recommended diet because the domestic food system at the time did not produce enough fruit, vegetables, or dairy . Furthermore, the they indicated that the agricultural industry over-produced grains, but American’s were still receiving too few whole grains because much of it was being consumed as refined-grains. The report suggested that grain production could decrease by 5.4 million acres and, with replacing refined grains with whole grains, still have enough grain to satisfy the recommended US Diet. More recently, the USDA shows that MV of corn, wheat, rice, and soy are still over consumed and fresh fruits and vegetables are under-consumed and have been implicated in the obesity epidemic . Scientists and journalists have long implicated governmental subsidies and other food-aid programs in the cause of obesity and improper nourishment , but others have refuted this point .
Obesity linked to an unbalanced diet is also growing globally. In many developing nations, displacing small, multi-crop, and non-staple farms with large monoculture staple farms diversifies food availability and changes local diet . For many people, the change in diet has been reduction in diet diversity, which perpetuates micronutrient deficiency . People who experience such a change in their food system undergo a “nutrition transition” to refined foods high in fat, sugar, and salt which lead to obesity , disproportionality affecting financially insecure people because traditional varietals now have a higher market price . Other nations that are experiencing large socio-economic changes suffer from the “double burden of malnutrition” , in which financially insecure people are undernourished and financially secure people areobese. In this case, those who are obese now have money and access to food, but cannot productively process that food because they are metabolically adapted to hunger from their youth when they were undernourishment . Policies across the world encouraged farmers to transition into growing MV crops for their high productivity . Globally, MV seeds and infrastructure, such as irrigation and tractors, are respectively expensive to buy and operate while the products have a comparatively low market value . The upfront cost is too great for small farms during the transition from subsistence farming; they often go into debt and then lose farms because they are not able to turn a large enough profit . In the US, instead of institutions that foster personalized connections between farmers and consumers that support medium and small diversified farms, what crops are grown and how they are grown is largely dictated by governmental subsidies, loan structures, and insurance .
These policies shape operating costs in such a way that helps only large farms succeed in turning a profit . In the United States, small and medium sized farms are shrinking in number, and large farms are growing in space, production, and profits . The number of farms has reduced from 7 million in 1935 to 2 million in 2016 , with 2.2% of farms controlling over a third of all crop land . In 2015, most farms operated above the US-median house hold income of $56,516, but many supplemented their household income with income from off-farm sources . For the farms accruing less than $10,000 in sales, which accounts for 48% of all farms, farm production had a median negative effect on household income, meaning the farms operated at a financial loss . In contrast, farms that made over $1,000,000 in sales had a median household income of over $300,000 from farming alone. Developing nations transitioning to industrial agriculture are also experiencing trends of increasing economic disparity among farmers 2010. Researchers and activists often characterize modern industrial agriculture as unsustainable because of its contributions to global climate change and other forms of environmental degradation. Clearing forests for crop land leads to changes in the hydrological cycle and reduction in carbon sequestration . Modern industrial agriculture creates up to 25% of global anthropogenic greenhouse gases from preproduction processes , production direct and indirect emissions from agriculture, and post production processes . Scholars also implicate modern industrial agriculture in reducing ecosystem health and diversity. Applied pesticides and fertilizers contaminate the water, soil, and air, poisoning humans, animals, and microorganisms .Excess nitrogen in soil reduces plant diversity and reproductive success . Certain pesticides have been proven to cause cancers in animals and linked to cancer cases and other health concerns in humans . Particular pesticides have been linked to a long term decline in bird and beneficial insect populations , including honey bees . Agricultural run-off in the Mississippi River created ecological “dead zones” in the Gulf of Mexico , contaminates large bodies of fresh water with blue-green algae blooms like the 2018 Lake Okeechobee algae bloom , and may exasperate naturally occurring red tides like the 2018 Florida red tide . Modern industrial agriculture also exhausts the natural resources it needs to function. It depletes accessible groundwater resources, which takes thousands of year to recharge, for irrigation and degrades soil, which is also a precious and difficult to rebuild resource, through poor farming practices such as seasonal tillage . These global changes strain the efficacy of all forms of food and agricultural systems, from small farm families to large industrial farming organizations. The agriculture industry suffers from ongoing significant declines in crop and livestock production from climate change induced stresses; societies are struggling with availability of food and water during intensifying droughts; humans are facing food, water and vector borne disease .Neither activists nor researchers share a canon definition or vision of a “sustainable” food and agriculture system, because these are formed by varying views and political climates . Agroecologist David Cleveland argues that the term “has been used to mean everything from giant, black flower bucket laser-level fields of genetically engineered soybean to tiny hillside plots growing tumbles of traditional maize, bean, squash, and herbs, cultivated by hand” . Mary V. Gold of the USDA National Agricultural Library suggests that “sustainable agriculture” is a term that defies definition but provides “a sense of direction, and an urgency, that has sparked innovative thinking the agricultural world.” However, there are common themes among the many conceptualizations of sustainable agriculture .
The first, perhaps most common, theme is to feed humans a nutritional diet for a long or indefinite amount of time . The second theme is that “sustainable” agricultural system must maximize environmental, social, and economic factors to achieve the goal of feeding people for a long, long time 1990. The third theme is that agriculture needs to be reframed as an intertwined natural and human system, typically called an agroecosystem .Gliessman defines an agroecosystem as a site or integrated region of agricultural production understood as an ecosystem . When considering levels of ecological organization , Gliessman’s interpretation of an agroecosystem is equivalent to an ecosystem composed of communities of living organisms and their environment, including all abiotic factors. In practice, an agroecosystem exists in and is inseparable from the spatially and ecologically larger landscape. Natural ecosystems and agroecosystems exist on a continuum of degree of human influence, where few, if any, natural ecosystems are completely void of human influence and agroecosystems vary in the degree of their human influence. Conceptually, boundaries of an agroecosystem are somewhat arbitrary because, as Gliessman states, “an agroecosystem is enmeshed in both social and natural worlds” . However, in terms of management, there is typically a defined spatial boundary, like a farm. Anything that comes from off the farm is an external human input, apart from natural inputs like sun light. All things on the farm are a part of the agroecosystem and are managed, whereas things beyond the boundary are a part of the natural ecosystem.Conway and Barbier describe agroecosystems as “a hierarchy ascending from the level of the individual plant or animal all the way to national systems linked by international trade” . Their hierarchy differs from Gliessman’s in that it is not a literal comparison to that of a local ecosystem. Instead, it expands Gliessman’s concept of an agroecosystem by incorporating the social constructs of the agrifood industry. This conceptualization of agroecosystems necessitates that each level “be analyzed and developed both in its own right and in relation to other levels above and below” . In this view, sustainable agricultural development cannot happen from farm-level research nor macro-economic policy alone. Ecosystem Services. Like natural ecosystems, agroecosystems systems provide ecosystem services . The researchers that complied the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment define ecosystem services as “the benefits that people obtain from the ecosystem” . These benefits include provisioning services, regulating services, cultural services, and supporting services . For a comparison of Millennium Ecosystem Assessment’s categorization of ecosystem services to other categorizations, see . By utilizing and generating ecosystem services, sustainable agriculture can reduce or eliminate the use of resources that contribute to a significant percentage of greenhouse gas emissions, , resources that poison consumers , and resources that decline through crop production .Another characterization of sustainable agriculture, particularly among activist groups like many permaculture communities, is “local.” Local agriculture can increase community resource security, public health, nutrition, social capital, and microenterprise opportunities . Not only food, but many essential goods used today like timber,fiber, medicine, household cleaners, etc., are or can be derived from local agricultural resources or byproducts. Growing resources locally helps a community achieve a certain amount of control over what they will consume, and the agricultural system that produces it – i.e., food and resource sovereignty . Locally grown resources also reduce or eliminate energy and other materials used in domestic and international transportation and storage, however, this is typically a very small percentage of a farm’s total fossil fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions . Transitioning to local agriculture and food systems in part addresses the underlying issue that people do not have much power over the food they eat or standards for how it is produced.